Thomas Foth
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 10%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 5
- Delphi Technique in Research 3
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 3
-
- Ethics in medical practice 3
- Co-authors
- Lee‐Anne Ufholz (3 shared papers)Susan Humphrey‐Murto (3 shared papers)Carol Gonsalves (2 shared papers)Timothy J. Wood (2 shared papers)Lara Varpio (2 shared papers)Carol Wang (1 shared paper)Dave Holmes (4 shared papers)Nikolaos Efstathiou (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nursing Philosophy (8 papers)Nursing Inquiry (5 papers)Academic Medicine (2 papers)International Journal of Nursing Studies (1 paper)Journal of Forensic Nursing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Foth
31 papers receiving 745 citations
Thomas Foth's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Research and Theory 18
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
- Family Practice 10
- General Health Professions 127
- Health Informatics 7
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Foth
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Foth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Foth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Foth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Foth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Foth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Foth. The network helps show where Thomas Foth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Foth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 383 |
| 2 | 2016 | 147 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 6 | Radical Sex Between Men : Assembling Desiring-Machines | 2017 | 16 |
| 7 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 4 |
About Thomas Foth
Thomas Foth is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 33 papers that have together received 755 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), Medical History and Research (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (18 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations), Family Practice (10 citations), General Health Professions (127 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Thomas Foth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lee‐Anne Ufholz, Susan Humphrey‐Murto, Carol Gonsalves, Timothy J. Wood, Lara Varpio, Carol Wang, Dave Holmes, Nikolaos Efstathiou, Brandi Vanderspank‐Wright and Kylie Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Philosophy, Nursing Inquiry, Academic Medicine, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Forensic Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.