Thomas E. McCann

17 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

Thomas E. McCann
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Developmental Neuroscience 54
  • Cell Biology 201
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 197
  • Endocrinology 38
  • Molecular Medicine 25
Replace Kathryn M. Schultz with:
Kathryn M. Schultz United States
Daniel M. Balkin United States
Hsing‐Yin Liu United States
L. Callegaro Italy
Sukhen C. Ghosh United States
Nico van Rooijen Netherlands
Ao Shen China
Austin K. Mattox United States
Kavitha S. Rao United States
Le Dai United States
Thomas E. McCann relative to Kathryn M. Schultz United States Kathryn M. Schultz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Kathryn M. Schultz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. McCann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. McCann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. McCann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. McCann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. McCann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. McCann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. McCann. The network helps show where Thomas E. McCann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. McCann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. McCann Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. McCann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2008201
2 2007106
3 200870
4 201152
5 196751
6 201044
7 197437
8 201232
9 201024
10 201419
11 201019
12 197612
13 201212
14 201011
15 20147
16 19753
17 20142

About Thomas E. McCann

Thomas E. McCann is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cell Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 17 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (2 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (1 paper) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (54 citations), Cell Biology (201 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (197 citations), Endocrinology (38 citations) and Molecular Medicine (25 citations). Thomas E. McCann has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Herbert M. Geller, Yasuhiro Katagiri, Hang Wang, Tracy L. Laabs, Peter L. Choyke, Nobuyuki Kosaka, Hisataka Kobayashi, Makoto Mitsunaga, James W. Fawcett and Aviva J. Symes. Their work appears in journals such as Infection and Immunity, Bioconjugate Chemistry, Molecular Imaging and Biology, NMR in Biomedicine and Clinical Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact