Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell

66 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 204
  • Health 308
  • Clinical Psychology 778
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 439
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
Replace Colter Mitchell with:
Colter Mitchell United States
Lindsay Till Hoyt United States
Timothy Matthews United Kingdom
Denise L. Janicki United States
Vernessa R. Clark United States
Misaki N. Natsuaki United States
Lisa M. Jaremka United States
Paul Florsheim United States
Bridget J. Goosby United States
Katharine H. Zeiders United States
Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell relative to Colter Mitchell United States Colter Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Colter Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell. The network helps show where Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013251
2 2009202
3 2015163
4 2011128
5 2011117
6 2012113
7 2012112
8 2010102
9 2015101
10 201198
11 201690
12 201285
13 201685
14 201980
15 201380
16 201076
17 201775
18 202069
19 201167
20 201057

About Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell

Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 68 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (14 papers), Sleep and related disorders (10 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (204 citations), Health (308 citations), Clinical Psychology (778 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (439 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.1k citations). Thomas E. Fuller‐Rowell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Anthony D. Ong, Stacey N. Doan, Anthony L. Burrow, Mona El‐Sheikh, David Stuart Curtis, Carol Diane Ryff, Gary William Evans, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, David H. Chae and Derald Wing Sue. Their work appears in journals such as Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, Health Psychology, Sleep Medicine, Psychoneuroendocrinology and Psychosomatic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact