Thomas E. Chapman

46 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Clinical Biochemistry 293
  • Biochemistry 162
  • Cell Biology 309
  • Physiology 462
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 269
Replace Conrad Arnold Elvehjem with:
Conrad Arnold Elvehjem United States
D. S. Parsons United Kingdom
K.A. Gumaa United Kingdom
Leon Milewich United States
Laszlo Jozsef Wagner Hungary
Edward B. Fern United Kingdom
Nepomuk Zöllner Germany
H.J. Degenhart Netherlands
Rudolph M. Tomarelli United States
Helen L. Henry United States
Thomas E. Chapman relative to Conrad Arnold Elvehjem United States Conrad Arnold Elvehjem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Conrad Arnold Elvehjem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Chapman. The network helps show where Thomas E. Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993185
2 1993121
3 1983120
4 1993110
5 199593
6 200189
7 199586
8 200774
9 199473
10 199566
11 199557
12 199452
13 199446
14 199344
15 199043
16 200039
17 199338
18 199337
19 197730
20 196427

About Thomas E. Chapman

Thomas E. Chapman is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Clinical Biochemistry and Cell Biology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (9 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (9 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension (5 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (293 citations), Biochemistry (162 citations), Cell Biology (309 citations), Physiology (462 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (269 citations). Thomas E. Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Leticia Castillo, V. R. Young, John Frederick Burke, A. M. Ajami, Josef Albert Vogt, Melchor Sánchez Mendiola, Philip G. Roeder, Steven R. Tannenbaum, Yong‐Ming Yu and Rodrigo Aguilera. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Research, Journal of Mass Spectrometry, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, Metabolism and Journal of Animal Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact