Thomas Ducret

61 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Ducret
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Sensory Systems 459
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 314
  • Molecular Biology 932
  • Physiology 317
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 34
Replace Kenneth L. Byron with:
Kenneth L. Byron United States
Pedro J. Camello Spain
Diego Álvarez de la Rosa Spain
Stéphanie Thebault Mexico
Katharine Walker United States
Roberto Berra‐Romani Mexico
Piruthivi Sukumar United Kingdom
Oliver G. Rößler Germany
Alexander A. Mongin United States
Zongxiang Tang China
Thomas Ducret relative to Kenneth L. Byron United States Kenneth L. Byron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Kenneth L. Byron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Ducret

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Ducret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Ducret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Ducret more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Ducret

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Ducret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Ducret. The network helps show where Thomas Ducret may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Ducret, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Ducret Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Ducret links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005186
2 201188
3 201282
4 201374
5 200666
6 200563
7 201559
8 201858
9 200654
10 201054
11 200851
12 201148
13 200748
14 199446
15 201245
16 201440
17 201039
18 201638
19 201637
20 200234

About Thomas Ducret

Thomas Ducret is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Physiology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion Channels and Receptors (18 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (18 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers) and Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (459 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (314 citations), Molecular Biology (932 citations), Physiology (317 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (34 citations). Thomas Ducret has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Pierre Savineau, Roger Marthan, Christelle Guibert, Jean‐François Quignard, Pierre Vacher, Cesare Mondadori, Guillaume Cardouat, Philippe Gailly, Patrick Legembre and Diana Dahan. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Calcium, American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Cells, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact