Thomas D. Scott

26 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Internal Medicine 28
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 167
  • Rehabilitation 36
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 48
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 67
Replace R Itabashi with:
R Itabashi Japan
Bjoern Misselwitz Germany
Sajith Sukumaran India
Kamal K. Pourmoghadam United States
John Newton Fink New Zealand
Marek Orban Czechia
Maenia Scarpino Italy
Kimberly A. Hasselfeld United States
Sara Rostanski United States
Jens Schneider Germany
Thomas D. Scott relative to R Itabashi Japan R Itabashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
R Itabashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Scott. The network helps show where Thomas D. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201180
2 199768
3 201349
4 197240
5 201038
6 197134
7 201419
8 201619
9
Feasibility and safety of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era.
200917
10 200815
11 201515
12 201215
13 197114
14 199310
15 198810
16 199310
17 197310
18 19727
19 20206
20 20095

About Thomas D. Scott

Thomas D. Scott is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Surgery and Oceanography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Underwater Acoustics Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (28 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (167 citations), Rehabilitation (36 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (48 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (67 citations). Thomas D. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James C. Blankenship, Kimberly A. Skelding, Peter B. Berger, David James Johnstone, William H. Smith, Ralph J. Berger, Roy P. Basler, Jennifer A. Sartorius, John McB. Hodgson and James M. Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Radio Science, The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact