Thomas D. Scott

25 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Thomas D. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 153
  • Internal Medicine 22
  • Rehabilitation 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
  • Speech and Hearing 20
Replace Ryo Itabashi with:
Ryo Itabashi Japan
B. Misselwitz Germany
Rajesh Kumar Pakistan
Jun Oto Japan
Sara Rostanski United States
John Dallara United States
Ken C. Beck United States
Russell Chabanne France
Kimberly A. Hasselfeld United States
G. L. Leathart United Kingdom
Thomas D. Scott relative to Ryo Itabashi Japan Ryo Itabashi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Ryo Itabashi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Scott. The network helps show where Thomas D. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201175
2 199758
3 201345
4 197237
5 201035
6 197129
7 201621
8
Feasibility and safety of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era.
200916
9 201416
10 201215
11 197114
12 200813
13 201512
14 197310
15 199310
16 19889
17 19938
18 19727
19 20095
20 20214

About Thomas D. Scott

Thomas D. Scott is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (6 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers), Underwater Acoustics Research (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Soft tissue tumors and treatment (1 paper) and Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (153 citations), Internal Medicine (22 citations), Rehabilitation (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Speech and Hearing (20 citations). Thomas D. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James C. Blankenship, Peter B. Berger, Kimberly A. Skelding, David Johnstone, William H. Smith, Ralph J. Berger, Roy P. Basler, Jennifer Sartorius, Thomas Haldis and John McB. Hodgson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), Radio Science, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions and American Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact