Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

140.4k citations
8.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

7.4k papers receiving 125.2k citations

Peers

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 53.7k
  • Internal Medicine 6.2k
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 46.9k
  • Surgery 59.1k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 22.1k
Replace JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions with:
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions United States
International Journal of Cardiology United States
Circulation Journal Japan
Angiology United States
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Germany
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery United Kingdom
European Radiology Germany
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology United States
Journal of Surgical Research United States
Clinical Radiology United Kingdom
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions relative to JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions United States JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

About Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

The 8.6k papers published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions in the last decades have received a total of 140.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.4k papers), Internal Medicine (315 papers), Surgery (3.8k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.7k papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (2.6k papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (1.7k papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (837 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (802 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (775 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (693 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (450 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (448 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions are Ziyad M. Hijazi, Michael R. Jaff, Shigeru Saito, Jacqueline Saw, Antonio Colombo, Patrick W. Serruys, Tejas Patel, Samir Pancholy, Christopher J. White and John P. Cheatham.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact