Thomas D. Morgan

2.6k citations
78 papers · 1.9k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas D. Morgan

71 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas D. Morgan
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Insect Science 724
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 363
  • Orthodontics 75
  • Biotechnology 143
  • Plant Science 471
Replace Claudia C. Häse with:
Claudia C. Häse United States
Steven E. Finkel United States
Lawrence J. Shimkets United States
Chikara Hirayama Japan
John Jagger United States
William J. Simon United Kingdom
Katsutoshi Ito Japan
Atsushi Sakai Japan
Ian R. Brown United Kingdom
Donat-P. Häder Germany
Thomas D. Morgan relative to Claudia C. Häse United States Claudia C. Häse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.1×
Claudia C. Häse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas D. Morgan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas D. Morgan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas D. Morgan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas D. Morgan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas D. Morgan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas D. Morgan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas D. Morgan. The network helps show where Thomas D. Morgan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas D. Morgan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas D. Morgan Line = papers co-authored together Thomas D. Morgan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001158
2 1998119
3 1982118
4 198499
5 199890
6 200085
7 199683
8 199269
9 198568
10 200564
11 200264
12 198755
13 199655
14 198452
15 199352
16 199151
17 198349
18 201638
19 199636
20 199335

About Thomas D. Morgan

Thomas D. Morgan is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Law, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (16 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (14 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (13 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (11 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (9 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (724 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (363 citations), Orthodontics (75 citations), Biotechnology (143 citations) and Plant Science (471 citations). Thomas D. Morgan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Karl J. Kramer, Theodore L. Hopkins, Michael Wilson, Yoichi Aso, T.H. Czapla, Brenda Oppert, Gerald R. Reeck, G. M. Chippendale, Lowell B. Johnson and Frank F. White. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Journal of Applied Microbiology, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of Stored Products Research and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact