Thomas Crump

24 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Thomas Crump
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Theoretical Computer Science 11
  • Anthropology 60
  • General Decision Sciences 8
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 7
  • Sociology and Political Science 163
Replace James Hoopes with:
James Hoopes United States
A. R. Louch United States
H. C. Barnard United Kingdom
Dennis Edwin Showalter United States
Robert W. Friedrichs United States
G. H. Bantock United Kingdom
Robert Maynard Hutchins United States
Paul Fussell United States
Antoine Prost France
Richard Ohmann United States
Thomas Crump relative to James Hoopes United States James Hoopes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
James Hoopes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Crump

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Crump's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Crump with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Crump more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Crump

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Crump. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Crump. The network helps show where Thomas Crump may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Crump, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Crump Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Crump links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990100
2 198378
3 197446
4 198243
5 197936
6 197630
7 198621
8 197820
9 197419
10 198214
11 198413
12 199212
13 19869
14 19929
15
The death of an emperor: Japan at the crossroads
19896
16
Anthropologie des nombres : savoir-compter, cultures et sociétés
19954
17 19944
18 19884
19 20132
20 19852

About Thomas Crump

Thomas Crump is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Cultural Studies, Law, Theoretical Computer Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 27 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (1 paper), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), African history and culture analysis (1 paper), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper), International Relations and Foreign Policy (1 paper) and Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations), Anthropology (60 citations), General Decision Sciences (8 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (7 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (163 citations). Thomas Crump has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David M. Hayano, Sandra Wallman, William Outhwaite, Jane Collier, Patrick S. Atiyah, Gisèle De Meur, David D. Gilmore, Ben Orlove, STANLEY H. BRANDES and Jérémy Boissevain. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, Current Anthropology, Anthropology Today, American Behavioral Scientist and The American Journal of Comparative Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact