Stephen Gudeman

70 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Gudeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Anthropology 415
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 155
  • Geography, Planning and Development 93
  • Sociology and Political Science 625
  • Cultural Studies 104
Replace Ian Roxborough with:
Ian Roxborough United States
Harry G. West United Kingdom
William Roseberry United States
Rosemary J. Coombe Canada
June Nash United States
Edward LiPuma United States
Peter Loïzos United Kingdom
R. L. Stirrat United Kingdom
Jérémy Boissevain Netherlands
Joel S. Kahn Australia
Stephen Gudeman relative to Ian Roxborough United States Ian Roxborough's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ian Roxborough · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Gudeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Gudeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Gudeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Gudeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Gudeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Gudeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Gudeman. The network helps show where Stephen Gudeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Gudeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Gudeman Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Gudeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987188
2 1990152
3 1990134
4
The Anthropology of Economy
2001110
5 2008102
6 199172
7 200868
8
The demise of a rural economy From subsistence to capitalism in a Latin American village
197855
9 201549
10 199243
11 198240
12 200940
13 198538
14 198833
15 197133
16 199332
17 198532
18 201230
19 199128
20 197822

About Stephen Gudeman

Stephen Gudeman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Demography, Anthropology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Politics in Latin America (4 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (4 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Latin American history and culture (4 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers) and Agriculture and Rural Development Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (415 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (155 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (93 citations), Sociology and Political Science (625 citations) and Cultural Studies (104 citations). Stephen Gudeman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and North Macedonia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Rigby, Alberto J. Olvera, Joanne Rappaport, Guillermo de la Peña, Chris Hann, Cynthia Hewitt de Alcántara, Hugo G. Nutini, John Hawkins, Richard Wilk and Peter Wade. Their work appears in journals such as American Ethnologist, Current Anthropology, American Anthropologist, Anthropological Forum and Social Science History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact