Thomas Cha

1.0k citations
41 papers · 701 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

    • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 13
    • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 10
    • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 7
    • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 21

Thomas Cha

40 papers receiving 691 citations

Peers

Thomas Cha
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 250
  • Health Informatics 16
  • Surgery 303
  • Pharmacology 87
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 30
Replace Micheal Raad with:
Micheal Raad United States
Nicholas Spina United States
Eric A. Potts United States
Evan Sheha United States
Patrick R. Olson United States
Jeffrey L. Gum United States
Mark J. Lambrechts United States
Michael E. Steinhaus United States
Jake McDonnell Ireland
Parastou Fatemi United States
Thomas Cha relative to Micheal Raad United States Micheal Raad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Micheal Raad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Cha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Cha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Cha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Cha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Cha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Cha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Cha. The network helps show where Thomas Cha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Cha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Cha Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Cha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201884
2 201881
3 201761
4 202056
5 201340
6 201936
7 201933
8 202033
9 202125
10 201924
11 201524
12 201922
13 201521
14 201621
15 201917
16 201815
17 202013
18 202110
19 20127
20 20207

About Thomas Cha

Thomas Cha is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Biomedical Engineering and General Health Professions, having authored 41 papers that have together received 701 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (21 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (13 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (10 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (250 citations), Health Informatics (16 citations), Surgery (303 citations), Pharmacology (87 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (30 citations). Thomas Cha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Guoan Li, Stuart H. Hershman, Joseph H. Schwab, Chaochao Zhou, Christopher M. Bono, Anmol Gupta, Harold A. Fogel, Karen Sepucha, Steven J. Atlas and Andrew A. Freiberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Global Spine Journal, Journal of Biomechanics, Annals of Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Biomechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact