Thomas Cerny

2.9k citations
53 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

    • Lung Cancer Research Studies 3
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 3
    • vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches 3

Thomas Cerny

53 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Cerny
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Oncology 680
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 240
  • Cancer Research 193
  • Pharmacology 176
  • Immunology 223
Replace D. Lynne Smith with:
D. Lynne Smith United States
John W. Loewy United States
Anne Tang United States
Boram Park South Korea
Edmée Franssen Canada
Shahrad R. Rassekh Canada
Elizabeth A. Tindall United States
Satoru Nagase Japan
Pierre Lévy France
Joseph A. Lucci United States
Thomas Cerny relative to D. Lynne Smith United States D. Lynne Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
D. Lynne Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Cerny

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Cerny's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Cerny with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Cerny more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Cerny

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Cerny. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Cerny. The network helps show where Thomas Cerny may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Cerny, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Cerny Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Cerny links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006297
2 1996191
3
Prostate stem cell antigen is a promising candidate for immunotherapy of advanced prostate cancer.
2000130
4 2011128
5 1986128
6 200695
7 201494
8 200787
9 198681
10 201779
11 201071
12 201566
13 201364
14 201360
15 200252
16 201547
17 199245
18 201740
19 200939
20 201737

About Thomas Cerny

Thomas Cerny is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research and Epidemiology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (5 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (4 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (680 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (240 citations), Cancer Research (193 citations), Pharmacology (176 citations) and Immunology (223 citations). Thomas Cerny has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Florian Strasser, N. Thatcher, P S Hasleton, Ulrich Güller, Jim Heighway, Markus Joerger, Thomas Ruhstaller, René Warschkow, Mathias Worni and Bruno M. Schmied. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Lung Cancer, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology and Pancreas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact