Tom Powles
Impact in
- Oncology top 2%
- Viral-associated cancers and disorders
- Polyomavirus and related diseases
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
-
- Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Mark Bower (27 shared papers)Mark Nelson (23 shared papers)Brian Gazzard (20 shared papers)Justin Stebbing (18 shared papers)Sundhiya Mandalia (8 shared papers)Tom Newsom‐Davis (3 shared papers)Silke Gillessen (3 shared papers)Maria De Santis (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Annals of Oncology (21 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (8 papers)British Journal of Cancer (5 papers)European Urology (4 papers)Blood (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tom Powles
77 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Tom Powles's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Oncology 1.2k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 498
- Surgery 958
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 486
- Virology 64
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Powles
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Powles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Powles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Powles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Powles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Powles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Powles. The network helps show where Tom Powles may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Powles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 333 |
| 2 | 2014 | 212 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 171 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 163 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 151 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 140 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 134 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 119 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 110 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 99 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 81 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 71 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 60 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 46 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 39 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 39 |
About Tom Powles
Tom Powles is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (23 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (19 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (16 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (14 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (13 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (9 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (7 papers) and Renal and related cancers (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (498 citations), Surgery (958 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (486 citations) and Virology (64 citations). Tom Powles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Bower, Mark Nelson, Brian Gazzard, Justin Stebbing, Sundhiya Mandalia, Tom Newsom‐Davis, Silke Gillessen, Maria De Santis, Joaquim Bellmunt and R.T.D. Oliver. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, European Urology and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.