Thomas Britt
Impact in
-
- Liquid Crystal Research Advancements
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
- Co-authors
- Anselm C. Griffin (6 shared papers)J. Kevin Gillie (2 shared papers)Marianne L. McKelvy (2 shared papers)C. L. Putzig (1 shared paper)Richard A. Nyquist (1 shared paper)Richard F. Fisher (1 shared paper)D. Wayne Goodman (1 shared paper)Stephen J. Havens (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (2 papers)Journal of Visual Art Practice (1 paper)International Journal of Public Theology (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)New Review of Film and Television Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Britt
10 papers receiving 374 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 224
- Spectroscopy 100
- Organic Chemistry 167
- Analytical Chemistry 44
- Polymers and Plastics 55
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Britt
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Britt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Britt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Britt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Britt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Britt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Britt. The network helps show where Thomas Britt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Britt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 175 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 59 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 54 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 32 | |
| 5 | 1978 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 0 |
About Thomas Britt
Thomas Britt is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Literature and Literary Theory, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Economics and Econometrics and Spectroscopy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Synthesis and properties of polymers (2 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (2 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (224 citations), Spectroscopy (100 citations), Organic Chemistry (167 citations), Analytical Chemistry (44 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (55 citations). Thomas Britt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anselm C. Griffin, J. Kevin Gillie, Marianne L. McKelvy, C. L. Putzig, Richard A. Nyquist, Richard F. Fisher, D. Wayne Goodman, Stephen J. Havens and Rachel Muers. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Journal of Visual Art Practice, International Journal of Public Theology, Journal of the American Chemical Society and New Review of Film and Television Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.