Thomas Booth
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 6
- Pharmacology 11
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 11
- Co-authors
- Yit‐Heng Chooi (5 shared papers)Marnix H. Medema (2 shared papers)Cameron L. M. Gilchrist (2 shared papers)Charles E. Miller (2 shared papers)Barrie Wilkinson (4 shared papers)Mohammad Alanjary (1 shared paper)Ernest Lacey (5 shared papers)Robert J. Capon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Biology (2 papers)BMC Bioinformatics (2 papers)Mycologia (2 papers)Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (2 papers)Chemical Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Booth
27 papers receiving 465 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pharmacology 198
- Biotechnology 68
- Molecular Biology 250
- Paleontology 21
- Archeology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Booth
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Booth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Booth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Booth. The network helps show where Thomas Booth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 146 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 5 | 1968 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 5 |
About Thomas Booth
Thomas Booth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Genetics and Archeology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 481 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (11 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (6 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (3 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Race, Genetics, and Society (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers) and Marine Sponges and Natural Products (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (198 citations), Biotechnology (68 citations), Molecular Biology (250 citations), Paleontology (21 citations) and Archeology (28 citations). Thomas Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yit‐Heng Chooi, Marnix H. Medema, Cameron L. M. Gilchrist, Charles E. Miller, Barrie Wilkinson, Mohammad Alanjary, Ernest Lacey, Robert J. Capon, Silke Alt and Kenan A. J. Bozhüyük. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, BMC Bioinformatics, Mycologia, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Chemical Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.