Thomas Böcker

448 citations
13 papers · 306 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

    • Weed Control and Herbicide Applications 5
    • Genetically Modified Organisms Research 2
    • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies 3

Thomas Böcker

11 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Thomas Böcker
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92
  • Pollution 86
  • Plant Science 169
  • Insect Science 47
  • Soil Science 37
Replace Haozhou Gong with:
Haozhou Gong China
Janice Degni United States
Seyyed Mahmoud Hashemi Iran
Thi Tan Loc Nguyen Vietnam
Raymond N. Nkongho Cameroon
A.W. Murage Kenya
Lena Ulber Germany
Richard Lamboll United Kingdom
Naier Emami Iran
Zeynab Jouzi United States
Thomas Böcker relative to Haozhou Gong China Haozhou Gong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Haozhou Gong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Böcker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Böcker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Böcker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Böcker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Böcker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Böcker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Böcker. The network helps show where Thomas Böcker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Böcker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Böcker Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Böcker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201681
2 201768
3 201958
4 201638
5 201729
6 201826
7 20161
8 20171
9 20181
10 20171
11 20181
12 20171
13 20210

About Thomas Böcker

Thomas Böcker is a scholar working on Plant Science, Pollution, Soil Science, Economics and Econometrics and Molecular Biology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Weed Control and Herbicide Applications (5 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (2 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (2 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (1 paper), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (1 paper) and Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (92 citations), Pollution (86 citations), Plant Science (169 citations), Insect Science (47 citations) and Soil Science (37 citations). Thomas Böcker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Finger, Niklas Möhring, Tobias Dalhaus, Wolfgang Britz and Robert P. Finger. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, European Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Systems, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact