Thomas Blon

60 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Blon
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Structural Biology 46
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 282
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 444
  • Biomedical Engineering 497
  • Materials Chemistry 491
Replace Patrick Han with:
Patrick Han United States
Shima Kadkhodazadeh Denmark
Jens Kunstmann Germany
Pingo Mutombo Czechia
Søren Ulstrup Denmark
Jérôme Lagoute France
Neerav Kharche United States
Falco Hüser Denmark
Yang Luo China
Alexander Igorevich Chernov Russia
Thomas Blon relative to Patrick Han United States Patrick Han's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Patrick Han · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blon. The network helps show where Thomas Blon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Blon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Blon Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Blon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006231
2 2008117
3 201288
4 201569
5 201458
6 200955
7 200853
8 200351
9 201637
10 201135
11 201731
12 201431
13 200829
14 201226
15 200423
16 201517
17 201117
18 200616
19 201615
20 200214

About Thomas Blon

Thomas Blon is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (32 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (9 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (8 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (5 papers), Graphene research and applications (5 papers), Nanoporous metals and alloys (5 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (5 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (46 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (282 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (444 citations), Biomedical Engineering (497 citations) and Materials Chemistry (491 citations). Thomas Blon has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Lise‐Marie Lacroix, Marc Respaud, Christophe Gatel, Bruno N. Chaudret, E. Snoeck, Sébastien Lachaize, Julian Carrey, Bénédicte Warot-Fonrose, Bruno Chaudret and E. Snoeck. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Nanoscale.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact