Thomas Blake
Impact in
-
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
- Particle Detector Development and Performance
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Neutrino Physics Research
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Papers in
-
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 721
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 219
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 54
- Particle Detector Development and Performance 35
- Co-authors
- GAIA LANFRANCHI (1 shared paper)David M. Straub (1 shared paper)U. Egede (4 shared papers)Danny van Dyk (2 shared papers)Stefan Meinel (2 shared papers)Konstantinos A. Petridis (2 shared papers)P. Owen (2 shared papers)A. Shires (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of High Energy Physics (267 papers)Physical Review Letters (198 papers)Physical review. D (86 papers)Physics Letters B (77 papers)The European Physical Journal C (63 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandFranceNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas Blake
836 papers receiving 30.3k citations
Thomas Blake's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 31.6k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 84
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 114
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 102
- Hardware and Architecture 19
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blake
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blake. The network helps show where Thomas Blake may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 891 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Observation of J / ψ p Resonances Consistent with Pentaquark States in Λ b 0 → J / ψ K − p Decays Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 968 |
| 2 | Test of Lepton Universality Using B + → K + ℓ + ℓ − Decays Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 681 |
| 3 | Observation of a Narrow Pentaquark State, P c ( 4312 ) + , and of the Two-Peak Structure of the P c ( 4450 ) + Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 568 |
| 4 | Test of lepton universality with B 0 → K *0 ℓ + ℓ − decays Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 564 |
| 5 | Measurement of the Ratio of Branching Fractions B ( B ¯ 0 → D * + τ − ν ¯ τ ) / B ( B ¯ 0 → D * + μ − ν ¯ μ ) Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 497 |
| 6 | Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 432 |
| 7 | Observation of the Doubly Charmed Baryon Ξ c c + + Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 410 |
| 8 | Measurement of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B0→K*0μ+μ− Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 399 |
| 9 | Angular analysis of the B 0 → K *0 μ + μ − decay using 3 fb−1 of integrated luminosity Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 378 |
| 10 | Observation of the rare Bs0 →µ+µ− decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 342 |
| 11 | Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 301 |
| 12 | 2013 | 296 | |
| 13 | Search for Lepton-Universality Violation in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− Decays Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 291 |
| 14 | Observation of structure in the $J /\psi$ -pair mass spectrum Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 289 |
| 15 | 2014 | 285 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 279 | |
| 17 | Study of the doubly charmed tetraquark $${{{{{{\rm{T}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}^{+}$$ Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 267 |
| 18 | 2011 | 261 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 260 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 249 |
About Thomas Blake
Thomas Blake is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Waste Management and Disposal, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 891 papers that have together received 31.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (721 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (219 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (54 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (31.6k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (84 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (114 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (102 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (19 citations). Thomas Blake has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, France and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include GAIA LANFRANCHI, David M. Straub, U. Egede, Danny van Dyk, Stefan Meinel, Konstantinos A. Petridis, P. Owen, A. Shires, Timothy Gershon and Gudrun Hiller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. D, Physics Letters B and The European Physical Journal C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.