Péter Eső

433 citations
18 papers · 274 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Péter Eső

16 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Péter Eső
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Management Science and Operations Research 201
  • Marketing 95
  • Safety Research 80
  • Management Information Systems 49
  • Economics and Econometrics 118
Replace Humberto Moreira with:
Humberto Moreira Brazil
Thomas Tröger Germany
Aaron Bodoh-Creed United States
Domenico Menicucci Italy
Daniel F. Garrett France
René Kirkegaard Canada
Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn United States
Lambert Schoonbeek Netherlands
Stephen Morris United States
Ross M. Miller United States
Péter Eső relative to Humberto Moreira Brazil Humberto Moreira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Humberto Moreira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Eső

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Eső's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Eső with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Eső more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Eső

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Eső. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Eső. The network helps show where Péter Eső may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Péter Eső, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Eső Line = papers co-authored together Péter Eső links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201048
2 200742
3 199939
4 200336
5 201733
6 200413
7 201310
8 20119
9 20039
10
Wait and See
20088
11 20128
12 20096
13 20185
14 20034
15 20133
16
Optimális járadékfüggvény tervezése rugalmas nyugdíjrendszerre
20031
17
Árverés és verseny a közbeszerzésben [Auction and competition in public procurement]
19970
18
Optimális járadékfüggvény tervezése rugalmas nyugdíjrendszerre [Designing optimal benefit rules for flexible retirement]
20030

About Péter Eső

Péter Eső is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Accounting and Management Information Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (11 papers), Game Theory and Applications (7 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (3 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (201 citations), Marketing (95 citations), Safety Research (80 citations), Management Information Systems (49 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (118 citations). Péter Eső has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Balázs Szentes, Lucy White, James Schummer, Volker Nocke, András Simonovits, Kim‐Sau Chung, Chris Wallace and Yuk‐fai Fong. Their work appears in journals such as Economics Letters, International Journal of Game Theory, The RAND Journal of Economics, Journal of Economic Theory and Theoretical Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact