Thomas Blair
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Homelessness and Social Issues
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Papers in
-
- Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 2
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 2
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 2
- Co-authors
- Meredith Minkler (1 shared paper)Dallas Augustine (2 shared papers)Melissa Barragan (2 shared papers)Keramet Reiter (2 shared papers)David Lovell (1 shared paper)Joseph Ventura (1 shared paper)Randall Espinoza (1 shared paper)Sara Kim (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Academic Psychiatry (2 papers)JAMA (2 papers)American Journal of Public Health (2 papers)Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Blair
10 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 21
- General Health Professions 124
- Clinical Psychology 74
- Health 27
- Sociology and Political Science 137
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blair
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blair more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blair
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blair. The network helps show where Thomas Blair may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Blair, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 164 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 89 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 0 |
About Thomas Blair
Thomas Blair is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Infectious Diseases and Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Bone and Joint Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (21 citations), General Health Professions (124 citations), Clinical Psychology (74 citations), Health (27 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (137 citations). Thomas Blair has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Meredith Minkler, Dallas Augustine, Melissa Barragan, Keramet Reiter, David Lovell, Joseph Ventura, Randall Espinoza, Sara Kim, Lingqi Tang and E. Cheung. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Psychiatry, JAMA, American Journal of Public Health, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.