Thomas Berg

675 citations
24 papers · 550 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 0.5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
    • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Papers in

Thomas Berg

23 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Thomas Berg
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Toxicology 221
  • Spectroscopy 162
  • Analytical Chemistry 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 68
  • Pharmacology 61
Replace Dag Helge Strand with:
Dag Helge Strand Norway
Baohua Shen China
Marie Katrine Klose Nielsen Denmark
Yan Shi China
Jin Young Kim South Korea
Veniero Gambaro Italy
Maiko Kusano Japan
Katja Schulz Germany
P Kintz France
Giampietro Frison Italy
Thomas Berg relative to Dag Helge Strand Norway Dag Helge Strand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dag Helge Strand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Berg. The network helps show where Thomas Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Berg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Berg Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Berg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011130
2 2008109
3 201648
4 201437
5 200732
6 201528
7 201324
8 201822
9 201818
10 201718
11 198518
12 202016
13 202012
14 20148
15 20206
16 20226
17 20176
18 19973
19 20052
20 20212

About Thomas Berg

Thomas Berg is a scholar working on Toxicology, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 24 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (13 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (7 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (2 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (221 citations), Spectroscopy (162 citations), Analytical Chemistry (68 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (68 citations) and Pharmacology (61 citations). Thomas Berg has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Portugal and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Dag Helge Strand, Asbjørg S. Christophersen, Elsa Lundanes, Åse Marit Leere Øiestad, Huiling Liu, Morten Karlsen, Jon Eigill Johansen, Elisabeth Leere Øiestad, Ritva Karinen and Lakhwinder Kaur. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Journal of Chromatography B, BMJ Open and Drug Testing and Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact