Thomas Baar

867 citations
51 papers · 661 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Baar

46 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Thomas Baar
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Software 422
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 107
  • Artificial Intelligence 218
  • Computer Science Applications 15
  • Information Systems 28
Replace Martin Strecker with:
Martin Strecker France
A. Modet United States
Andreas Griesmayer Austria
Frédéric Dadeau France
Martin Schäf United States
Mark Saaltink Canada
Mirco Kuhlmann Germany
Patrícia D. L. Machado Brazil
Aleksandar S. Dimovski Denmark
Marcelo Fabian Frias Argentina
Thomas Baar relative to Martin Strecker France Martin Strecker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Martin Strecker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Baar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Baar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Baar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Baar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Baar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Baar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Baar. The network helps show where Thomas Baar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Baar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Baar Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Baar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004197
2 200752
3 200549
4 200048
5 200543
6 200720
7 200720
8 200219
9 200619
10 200818
11
An Integrated Metamodel for OCL Types
200016
12 200014
13 200413
14 200613
15 200611
16 20069
17 20058
18 20037
19 20127
20 20005

About Thomas Baar

Thomas Baar is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 51 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (36 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (11 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (10 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Library Science and Information (1 paper) and Library Science and Information Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Software (422 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (107 citations), Artificial Intelligence (218 citations), Computer Science Applications (15 citations) and Information Systems (28 citations). Thomas Baar has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Reiner Hähnle, Peter H. Schmitt, Bernhard Beckert, Wolfgang Ahrendt, Wolfram Menzel, Frédéric Fondement, Wojciech Mostowski, Richard Bubel, Steffen Schlager C and Andreas Roth. Their work appears in journals such as Software & Systems Modeling, Lecture notes in computer science, Fundamenta Informaticae, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science and Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact