Richard Bubel

1.0k citations
69 papers · 807 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Bubel

66 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers

Richard Bubel
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Software 359
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 361
  • Artificial Intelligence 575
  • Hardware and Architecture 95
  • Information Systems 239
Replace Wolfgang Ahrendt with:
Wolfgang Ahrendt Sweden
Mattias Ulbrich Germany
Jorge A. Navas United States
Wonhong Nam South Korea
Malte Isberner Germany
Lilian Burdy France
Mukund Raghothaman United States
Joseph R. Kiniry Ireland
Thomas Wies United States
Pavol Černý United States
Richard Bubel relative to Wolfgang Ahrendt Sweden Wolfgang Ahrendt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Wolfgang Ahrendt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Bubel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Bubel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Bubel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Bubel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Bubel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Bubel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Bubel. The network helps show where Richard Bubel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Bubel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Bubel Line = papers co-authored together Richard Bubel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004208
2 201552
3 201442
4 201537
5 201728
6 201328
7 201020
8 201920
9 201418
10 201618
11 202017
12 200916
13 201616
14 201515
15 201115
16 201414
17 201813
18 201012
19 201612
20 201410

About Richard Bubel

Richard Bubel is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Information Systems and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 69 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (34 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (33 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (19 papers), Software Engineering Research (15 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (14 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (12 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (9 papers) and Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (359 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (361 citations), Artificial Intelligence (575 citations), Hardware and Architecture (95 citations) and Information Systems (239 citations). Richard Bubel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Reiner Hähnle, Wolfgang Ahrendt, Martin Hentschel, Bernhard Beckert, Peter H. Schmitt, Wojciech Mostowski, Andreas Roth, Thomas Baar, Steffen Schlager and Martin A. Giese. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Software & Systems Modeling, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, Journal of Automated Reasoning and Computers & Security.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact