Fundamenta Informaticae

3.2k papers and 24.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.2k papers published in Fundamenta Informaticae in the last decades have received a total of 24.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Fundamenta Informaticae usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.9k papers), Artificial Intelligence (1.7k papers) and Molecular Biology (448 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (547 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (504 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (482 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fundamenta Informaticae are Andrzej Skowron, Arnold Meijster, Jos B. T. M. Roerdink, Omar Abu Arqub, Melvin Fitting, Guiwu Wei, Jarosław Stepaniuk, Daniel Simson, Gheorghe Pǎun and Jerzy W. Grzymala‐Busse.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fundamenta Informaticae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fundamenta Informaticae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fundamenta Informaticae.

Countries where authors publish in Fundamenta Informaticae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fundamenta Informaticae. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fundamenta Informaticae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundamenta Informaticae more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025