Thomas A. Daniel

27 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Thomas A. Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 207
  • Human-Computer Interaction 38
  • Clinical Psychology 127
Replace Sara Scheveneels with:
Sara Scheveneels Belgium
Bettina Gathmann Germany
Maria Nazarian United States
Yujuan Choy United States
Joscha Böhnlein Germany
Kevin van Schie Netherlands
Hideki Negoro Japan
Gergely Darnai Hungary
Marieke B.J. Toffolo Netherlands
Mikael Rubin United States
Thomas A. Daniel relative to Sara Scheveneels Belgium Sara Scheveneels's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Sara Scheveneels · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas A. Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas A. Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas A. Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas A. Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas A. Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas A. Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas A. Daniel. The network helps show where Thomas A. Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas A. Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas A. Daniel Line = papers co-authored together Thomas A. Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201671
2 201770
3 201849
4 201740
5 201637
6 201730
7 201726
8 202018
9 201616
10 201915
11 201814
12 201514
13 201713
14 201712
15 20179
16 20188
17 20217
18 20157
19 20127
20 20205

About Thomas A. Daniel

Thomas A. Daniel is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (8 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (179 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (41 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (38 citations) and Clinical Psychology (127 citations). Thomas A. Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Bardeen, Jeffrey S. Katz, Jennifer L. Robinson, Thomas S. Denney, Gopikrishna Deshpande, J. Benjamin Hinnant, Michael N. Dretsch, Adam M. Goodman, D. Rangaprakash and Holly K. Orcutt. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Behavioural Processes, Psychology of Popular Media and Biological Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact