Therese Hellman

39 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

Therese Hellman
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 44
  • Occupational Therapy 29
  • General Health Professions 148
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 6
Replace Catelijne I. Joling with:
Catelijne I. Joling Netherlands
Carol Coole United Kingdom
Muriel G. Westmorland Canada
André Weel Netherlands
Ulrik Gensby Denmark
Peter C. Buijs Netherlands
Frank W. Neuhauser United States
Alf Bergroth Sweden
Ceyda Şahan Türkiye
Sophie Anaf Australia
Therese Hellman relative to Catelijne I. Joling Netherlands Catelijne I. Joling's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
Catelijne I. Joling · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Therese Hellman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Therese Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Therese Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Therese Hellman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Therese Hellman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Therese Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Therese Hellman. The network helps show where Therese Hellman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Therese Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Therese Hellman Line = papers co-authored together Therese Hellman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202037
2 201430
3 201629
4 201629
5 201923
6 201622
7 201619
8 201916
9 202016
10 201915
11 202214
12 201614
13 202012
14 201812
15 202010
16 20139
17 20228
18 20208
19 20208
20 20208

About Therese Hellman

Therese Hellman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Pharmacology, Occupational Therapy and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 43 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Technostress in Professional Settings (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (44 citations), Occupational Therapy (29 citations), General Health Professions (148 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (6 citations). Therese Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Japan and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include Magnus Svartengren, Gunnar Bergström, Irene B. Jensen, Ulla Johansson, Gunilla Margareta Eriksson, Elisabeth Björk Brämberg, Lydia Kwak, Lars Sandman, Hillevi Busch and Lotta Nybergh. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Disability and Rehabilitation, BMC Public Health, Journal of Interprofessional Care and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact