Theo van

688 citations
20 papers · 443 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Theo van

17 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

Theo van
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Linguistics and Language 192
  • Language and Linguistics 266
  • Literature and Literary Theory 160
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 106
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 99
Replace Sharon Hilles with:
Sharon Hilles United States
Virginia LoCastro United States
Alison d’Anglejan Canada
Leiv Egil Breivik Norway
Judith E. Liskin‐Gasparro United States
Ann K. Fathman United States
Hyekyung Sung United States
Jane Zuengler United States
David Barnwell United States
Jette G. Hansen United States
Theo van relative to Sharon Hilles United States Sharon Hilles's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Sharon Hilles · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Theo van

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Theo van's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo van with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo van more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Theo van

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo van. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo van. The network helps show where Theo van may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Theo van, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Theo van Line = papers co-authored together Theo van links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200573
2 198668
3 198765
4 198553
5 198740
6 200539
7 198736
8 198929
9 198710
10 19879
11 19897
12 19903
13 19833
14 20012
15 19872
16 19912
17 20101
18
Learning second and foreign languages
19841
19 19910
20
Processes of language change over time : A linguistic perspective on ethnic minority research in the Netherlands
19900

About Theo van

Theo van is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, Artificial Intelligence and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (8 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (192 citations), Language and Linguistics (266 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (160 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (106 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations). Theo van has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kees de Bot, G. Extra, Paul Meara, Theo Bongaerts, Bert Weltens, Mary Emily Call, Sally Sieloff Magnan, Flor Aarts and Colette van Kerckvoorde. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, European Journal of Education, ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, International Journal of Applied Linguistics and The Modern Language Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact