John B. Dalbor

492 citations
19 papers · 314 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

John B. Dalbor

15 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers

John B. Dalbor
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Linguistics and Language 127
  • Language and Linguistics 174
  • Literature and Literary Theory 79
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
Replace Charles W. Kreidler with:
Charles W. Kreidler United States
William E. Bull United States
Simon Belasco United States
Jan-Ola Östman Germany
Robert de Beaugrande United States
Ann K. Fathman United States
Theo van Netherlands
Werner Hüllen Germany
Roger Flavell
František Daneš
John B. Dalbor relative to Charles W. Kreidler United States Charles W. Kreidler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Charles W. Kreidler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John B. Dalbor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John B. Dalbor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John B. Dalbor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John B. Dalbor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John B. Dalbor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John B. Dalbor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John B. Dalbor. The network helps show where John B. Dalbor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside John B. Dalbor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John B. Dalbor Line = papers co-authored together John B. Dalbor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 197494
2 197280
3 197244
4 196830
5 196715
6 198310
7 198110
8 19809
9 19695
10
Spanish pronunciation; theory and practice: An introductory manual of Spanish phonology and remedial drill
19695
11 19735
12 19672
13 19891
14 19591
15 19691
16
Spanish in Review
19791
17
Oral Spanish review
19651
18 19610
19 19730

About John B. Dalbor

John B. Dalbor is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Linguistics and Language, having authored 19 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (7 papers), Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers), Literary and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (2 papers) and Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (127 citations), Language and Linguistics (174 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (79 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (85 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations). John B. Dalbor has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joshua A. Fishman, Terence Quinn, Paul Pimsleur, Rebecca M. Valette, Robert G. Mead, Robert Phillips and Myron I. Lichtblau. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, Hispania, Language Learning and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact