Theo deVos
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Papers in
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 5
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 2
-
- Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment 5
- Co-authors
- Fabian Model (4 shared papers)Catherine Lofton–Day (4 shared papers)Andrew Sledziewski (4 shared papers)Christian Pilarsky (4 shared papers)Robert Grützmann (4 shared papers)Reimo Tetzner (3 shared papers)Matthias Schuster (4 shared papers)Béla Molnár (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Experimental Parasitology (5 papers)Clinical Chemistry (2 papers)Gastroenterology (2 papers)Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology (2 papers)Journal of Parasitology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Theo deVos
22 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Cancer Research 503
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 380
- Oncology 551
- Molecular Biology 936
- Parasitology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Theo deVos
This map shows the geographic impact of Theo deVos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theo deVos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theo deVos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theo deVos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theo deVos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theo deVos. The network helps show where Theo deVos may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Theo deVos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 428 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 412 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 317 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 200 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 170 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 98 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 30 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 28 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 19 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 4 |
About Theo deVos
Theo deVos is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (5 papers), Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment (5 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (4 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers) and Complement system in diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (503 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (380 citations), Oncology (551 citations), Molecular Biology (936 citations) and Parasitology (88 citations). Theo deVos has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Fabian Model, Catherine Lofton–Day, Andrew Sledziewski, Christian Pilarsky, Robert Grützmann, Reimo Tetzner, Matthias Schuster, Béla Molnár, Volker Liebenberg and Xiaoling Song. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Parasitology, Clinical Chemistry, Gastroenterology, Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology and Journal of Parasitology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.