Countries where authors publish in Experimental Parasitology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Parasitology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Parasitology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Parasitology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Experimental Parasitology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Parasitology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Parasitology.
About Experimental Parasitology
The 8.1k papers published in Experimental Parasitology in the last decades have received a total of 176.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Experimental Parasitology usually cover Parasitology (3.3k papers), Small Animals (1.4k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.5k papers), Infectious Diseases (1.1k papers) and Insect Science (804 papers) specifically the topics of Trypanosoma species research and implications (1.5k papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (1.5k papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (1.4k papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (1.4k papers), Helminth infection and control (1.3k papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (1.0k papers), Malaria Research and Control (935 papers) and Coccidia and coccidiosis research (534 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Parasitology are Lihua Xiao, D.G. Godfrey, W. Malcolm Reid, Sheila M. Lanham, Joyce Johnson, M. A. Stirewált, Una Ryan, L.T. Threadgold, Masanori Aikawa and W. Peters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.