Tetsuya Nojima

12 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Tetsuya Nojima
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 342
  • Aging 31
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 223
  • Genetics 251
  • Insect Science 93
Replace Hania J. Pavlou with:
Hania J. Pavlou United Kingdom
Carolina Rezával United Kingdom
Kosei Sato Japan
Jon-Michael Knapp United States
Jade Atallah Canada
David T. Champlin United States
Carla Margulies United States
Andrew K. Shepherd United States
Anthony J. Dornan United Kingdom
Melissa Zars United States
Tetsuya Nojima relative to Hania J. Pavlou United Kingdom Hania J. Pavlou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hania J. Pavlou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tetsuya Nojima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tetsuya Nojima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tetsuya Nojima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tetsuya Nojima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tetsuya Nojima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tetsuya Nojima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tetsuya Nojima. The network helps show where Tetsuya Nojima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tetsuya Nojima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tetsuya Nojima Line = papers co-authored together Tetsuya Nojima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2014117
2 201180
3 201477
4 201648
5 201642
6 202139
7 201021
8 201415
9 20075
10 20193
11 20212
12
[An autopsy case with peculiar acidophilic bodies in the dentate nucleus and brain stem, associated with degeneration of the pyramidal-extrapyramidal systems].
19851
13 20260

About Tetsuya Nojima

Tetsuya Nojima is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Sensory Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (5 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (342 citations), Aging (31 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (223 citations), Genetics (251 citations) and Insect Science (93 citations). Tetsuya Nojima has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen F. Goodwin, Megan C. Neville, Andrew C. Lin, Carolina Rezával, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hania J. Pavlou, Benjamin Houot, Stéphane Dupas, Jean‐François Ferveur and François Bousquet. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Neurogenetics, Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, Cell Genomics and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact