Ted Palys

33 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Ted Palys
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Psychology 84
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 19
  • Gender Studies 96
  • Social Psychology 177
  • Clinical Psychology 182
Replace Karyn D. McKinney with:
Karyn D. McKinney United States
Ilka H. Gleibs United Kingdom
Susanne Täuber Netherlands
Anne O’Brien Ireland
Randall A. Gordon United States
Stanley O. Gaines United Kingdom
Matthew J. Easterbrook United Kingdom
Craig A. Hill United States
James M. Jones United States
Jane Goodman United States
Ted Palys relative to Karyn D. McKinney United States Karyn D. McKinney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Karyn D. McKinney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Palys

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Palys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Palys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Palys more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Palys

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Palys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Palys. The network helps show where Ted Palys may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Ted Palys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Palys Line = papers co-authored together Ted Palys links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983214
2
Research Decisions, Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives
1997195
3 198678
4 200033
5 201230
6 201223
7 200119
8 201319
9
Research decisions : quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches
201419
10 200218
11 201013
12 198012
13 198311
14 200110
15 200610
16 19877
17 20077
18 19846
19 20166
20 20165

About Ted Palys

Ted Palys is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Law, having authored 37 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (5 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (4 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (3 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (84 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (19 citations), Gender Studies (96 citations), Social Psychology (177 citations) and Clinical Psychology (182 citations). Ted Palys has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian R. Little, John Lowman, Chris Atchison, Donald G. Dutton, Lisa M. Given, Shelley A. M. Gavigan, Desmond Ellis, Michelle K. McGinn, Patrick O’Neill and Ashley Green. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Academic Ethics, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Sociological Methodology and Sociology of Sport Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact