Journal of Academic Ethics

584 papers and 5.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 584 papers published in Journal of Academic Ethics in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Academic Ethics usually cover Safety Research (288 papers), Information Systems and Management (232 papers) and General Health Professions (115 papers) specifically the topics of Academic integrity and plagiarism (273 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (221 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Academic Ethics are Will C. van den Hoonaard, Guy J. Curtis, Diane L. Swanson, David Ison, Jaume Sureda Negre, Rubén Comas Forgas, Tracey Bretag, Saadia Mahmud, Sara R. Jordan and Bruce Macfarlane.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Academic Ethics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Academic Ethics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Academic Ethics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Academic Ethics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Academic Ethics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Academic Ethics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Academic Ethics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025