Tasha Morrison

1.7k citations
19 papers · 1.2k · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Tasha Morrison

18 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Tasha Morrison
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 136
  • Cancer Research 238
  • Physiology 390
  • Molecular Biology 632
  • Oncology 184
Replace Maimon E. Hubbi with:
Maimon E. Hubbi United States
Rumela Chakrabarti United States
Stephanie Z. Xie United States
Sébastien Pinte France
Mark Eckersdorff United States
Gerald Chu United States
Young Jin Gi United States
Ka-Kei Ho United Kingdom
Helai P. Mohammad United States
Matteo Rossi Italy
Tasha Morrison relative to Maimon E. Hubbi United States Maimon E. Hubbi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Maimon E. Hubbi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tasha Morrison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tasha Morrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tasha Morrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tasha Morrison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tasha Morrison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tasha Morrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tasha Morrison. The network helps show where Tasha Morrison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tasha Morrison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tasha Morrison Line = papers co-authored together Tasha Morrison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2013470
2 2011154
3 2007130
4 2009125
5 2008107
6 201050
7 202045
8 201728
9 201327
10 201826
11 201420
12 201815
13 20169
14 20217
15 20146
16 20172
17 20142
18 20251
19 20090

About Tasha Morrison

Tasha Morrison is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cancer Research, Genetics and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (7 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (3 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (3 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (3 papers), Renal and related cancers (2 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (136 citations), Cancer Research (238 citations), Physiology (390 citations), Molecular Biology (632 citations) and Oncology (184 citations). Tasha Morrison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth P. Henske, Jane Yu, Magdalena Karbowniczek, Andrey A. Parkhitko, Chenggang Li, John Blenis, Lewis C. Cantley, George Poulogiannis, Marcia C. Haigis and Douglas J. Chapski. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Blood Advances, Science Immunology and Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact