Tamia K. Lapointe

16 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Tamia K. Lapointe
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Sensory Systems 174
  • Gastroenterology 117
  • Neurology 96
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 50
  • Parasitology 41
Replace Rami T. El–Sharkawy with:
Rami T. El–Sharkawy Canada
Zili Xie China
Lionel Bueno France
Dong‐Lai Ma China
Kuo‐Shyan Lu Taiwan
Md. Sharif Shajib Canada
Yuan Guo China
Jean-Claude Cuber France
Dagmar Krueger Germany
Christel Salvador–Cartier France
Tamia K. Lapointe relative to Rami T. El–Sharkawy Canada Rami T. El–Sharkawy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Rami T. El–Sharkawy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tamia K. Lapointe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamia K. Lapointe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamia K. Lapointe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamia K. Lapointe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamia K. Lapointe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamia K. Lapointe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamia K. Lapointe. The network helps show where Tamia K. Lapointe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tamia K. Lapointe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tamia K. Lapointe Line = papers co-authored together Tamia K. Lapointe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2013143
2 2010122
3 2005110
4 2015105
5 201658
6 201149
7 201142
8 200941
9 201041
10 201737
11 201135
12 200125
13 201211
14 20144
15 20143
16 20101

About Tamia K. Lapointe

Tamia K. Lapointe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Surgery, Sensory Systems and Physiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 827 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Barrier Structure and Function Studies (4 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (4 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (3 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (2 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (2 papers), Gut microbiota and health (2 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (174 citations), Gastroenterology (117 citations), Neurology (96 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (50 citations) and Parasitology (41 citations). Tamia K. Lapointe has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include André G. Buret, Christophe Altier, Pamela M. J. O’Connor, Paul L. Beck, Nathalie Vergnolle, Kevin Chapman, Philip M. Sherman, Jonathan B. Meddings, Jason P. Fedwick and Mircea Iftinca. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, The FASEB Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Infection and Immunity and Cell and Tissue Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact