Anikó Csecserits

3.2k citations
41 papers · 686 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anikó Csecserits

38 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Anikó Csecserits
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 430
  • Ecological Modeling 54
  • Ecology 277
  • Forestry 37
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 174
Replace Katalin Szitár with:
Katalin Szitár Hungary
Deborah Schäfer Switzerland
Gábor Ónodi Hungary
Ivana Jongepierová Czechia
Loralee Larios United States
Juan de Dios Miranda Spain
Zhijun Lu China
Jeffrey Clary United States
Giovanni Trentanovi Italy
Leonid Rasran Germany
Anikó Csecserits relative to Katalin Szitár Hungary Katalin Szitár's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Katalin Szitár · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anikó Csecserits

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anikó Csecserits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anikó Csecserits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anikó Csecserits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anikó Csecserits

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anikó Csecserits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anikó Csecserits. The network helps show where Anikó Csecserits may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anikó Csecserits, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anikó Csecserits Line = papers co-authored together Anikó Csecserits links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201178
2 201377
3 201577
4 200175
5 201639
6 202032
7 201831
8 201729
9 200728
10 201924
11 201820
12 201620
13 201117
14 201715
15 202214
16 202113
17 201312
18 202211
19 202310
20 202310

About Anikó Csecserits

Anikó Csecserits is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (18 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (9 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Botanical Studies and Applications (4 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (4 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (430 citations), Ecological Modeling (54 citations), Ecology (277 citations), Forestry (37 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (174 citations). Anikó Csecserits has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tamás Rédei, Melinda Halassy, Zoltán Botta‐Dukát, Katalin Szitár, Barbara Lhotsky, Katalin Török, György Kröel‐Dulay, Gábor Ónodi, Bence Kovács and Orsolya Valkó. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Vegetation Science, Restoration Ecology, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Global Ecology and Conservation and Journal of Vegetation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact