Taeboo Choe

72 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Taeboo Choe
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Cancer Research 171
  • Biochemistry 67
  • Molecular Biology 670
  • Cell Biology 115
  • Oncology 152
Replace Shanshan Guo with:
Shanshan Guo China
Yi‐Chiang Hsu Taiwan
Darren R. Williams South Korea
Kyungsil Yoon United States
Hyun Jung Hwang South Korea
Shanshan Yang China
Nicolas Clere France
Zhixu He China
Xiuli Yi China
Chen China
Taeboo Choe relative to Shanshan Guo China Shanshan Guo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Shanshan Guo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Taeboo Choe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Taeboo Choe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taeboo Choe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taeboo Choe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Taeboo Choe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Taeboo Choe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Taeboo Choe. The network helps show where Taeboo Choe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Taeboo Choe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Taeboo Choe Line = papers co-authored together Taeboo Choe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200996
2 200783
3 200783
4 201559
5 200054
6 198650
7 201149
8 200647
9 200842
10 201142
11 200939
12 198635
13
Expression of a novel Bcl-2 related gene, Bfl-1, in various human cancers and cancer cell lines.
199834
14 200633
15 200831
16 201731
17 201229
18 200829
19 200723
20 200122

About Taeboo Choe

Taeboo Choe is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Marketing, Cancer Research and Building and Construction, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior (10 papers), Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (8 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (6 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (6 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (5 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (4 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (171 citations), Biochemistry (67 citations), Molecular Biology (670 citations), Cell Biology (115 citations) and Oncology (152 citations). Taeboo Choe has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Seok‐Il Hong, In‐Chul Park, Sung‐Keum Seo, Hyeon‐Ok Jin, Sungkwan An, Sang‐Hyeok Woo, Doo‐Hyun Yoo, Hyung‐Chahn Lee, Chang‐Hun Rhee and Jong‐Il Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, Cancer Letters, Journal of Membrane Science and Archives of Pharmacal Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact