T. Nishimura

1.7k citations
26 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

T. Nishimura

26 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

T. Nishimura
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Animal Science and Zoology 903
  • Equine 45
  • Cell Biology 270
  • Biomaterials 188
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 84
Replace Anne Listrat with:
Anne Listrat France
Akihito Hattori Japan
H. J. Swatland Canada
M. D. Judge United States
Koui Takahashi Japan
Y. Geay France
J. R. Bendall United Kingdom
Shotaro Nishimura Japan
R. W. Bray United States
R.H. Locker New Zealand
T. Nishimura relative to Anne Listrat France Anne Listrat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anne Listrat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Nishimura

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Nishimura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Nishimura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Nishimura more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Nishimura

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Nishimura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Nishimura. The network helps show where T. Nishimura may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Nishimura, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Nishimura Line = papers co-authored together T. Nishimura links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999212
2 1996110
3 1999109
4 200398
5 199576
6 199868
7 199666
8 201164
9 199661
10 200459
11 200957
12 201457
13 199751
14 200947
15 199436
16 200232
17 199532
18 199431
19 200617
20 199616

About T. Nishimura

T. Nishimura is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Surgery and Biomaterials, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (10 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (4 papers), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers) and Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (903 citations), Equine (45 citations), Cell Biology (270 citations), Biomaterials (188 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (84 citations). T. Nishimura has collaborated with scholars based in Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Akihito Hattori, K. Takahashi, A. Liu, Jun‐ichi Wakamatsu, Tõru Hayakawa, Koichi Ojima, Koretarō Takahashi, Ken Takahashi, Koui Takahashi and Yoichi Ikeda. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Cells Tissues Organs, Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Animal Frontiers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact