Countries where authors publish in Animal Frontiers
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Animal Frontiers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Animal Frontiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Frontiers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Animal Frontiers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Animal Frontiers.
About Animal Frontiers
The 574 papers published in Animal Frontiers in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Animal Frontiers usually cover Animal Science and Zoology (153 papers), Small Animals (67 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (89 papers), Equine (11 papers) and Ecology (150 papers) specifically the topics of Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (131 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (82 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (66 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (54 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (52 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (34 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (33 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Animal Frontiers are Daniël Berckmans, T. Veldkamp, G. Bosch, Nicola Lacetera, Roland Lee, Jean‐Michel Lavoie, Arjen Y. Hoekstra, T.H.E. Meuwissen, Michael E. Goddard and Ben J. Hayes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.