Susan Shoemaker

574 citations
5 papers · 297 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Susan Shoemaker

4 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Susan Shoemaker
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Library and Information Sciences 34
  • Communication 96
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 95
  • Computer Science Applications 37
  • Education 160
Replace George Lorenzo with:
George Lorenzo United States
Eliza T. Dresang United States
Elizabeth J. Burge Canada
Yu-mei Wang United States
Janet Macdonald United Kingdom
Ann-Britt Enochsson Sweden
Helen Beetham United Kingdom
Aharon Aviram Israel
Connie L. Dillon United States
Stuart Boon United Kingdom
Susan Shoemaker relative to George Lorenzo United States George Lorenzo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
George Lorenzo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Susan Shoemaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Shoemaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Shoemaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Shoemaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Shoemaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Shoemaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Shoemaker. The network helps show where Susan Shoemaker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Susan Shoemaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Susan Shoemaker Line = papers co-authored together Susan Shoemaker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2006228
2 199955
3 200311
4
Information Exchange Networks in Low-Income Neighborhoods: Implications for Community Networking.
19992
5 19831

About Susan Shoemaker

Susan Shoemaker is a scholar working on Communication, Demography, Information Systems, Information Systems and Management and Library and Information Sciences, having authored 5 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper), ICT in Developing Communities (1 paper), Library Science and Administration (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (34 citations), Communication (96 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (95 citations), Computer Science Applications (37 citations) and Education (160 citations). Susan Shoemaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Haythornthwaite, Michelle M. Kazmer, Jennifer H. Robins and Ann Peterson Bishop. Their work appears in journals such as Research Strategies, Library & Information Science Research, Population Research and Policy Review, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication and Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact