Research Strategies

361 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 361 papers published in Research Strategies in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Research Strategies usually cover Library and Information Sciences (204 papers), Information Systems (145 papers) and Education (100 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (199 papers), Web and Library Services (106 papers) and Library Science and Administration (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research Strategies are Bárbara Fister, Sheila Webber, Bill Johnston, Penny Beile, Nancy H. Dewald, David N. Boote, Beth S. Woodard, Leon A. Jakobovits, Jennifer Brown and Angela J. DiBenedetto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research Strategies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research Strategies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research Strategies.

Countries where authors publish in Research Strategies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research Strategies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research Strategies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research Strategies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025