Stuart Clegg
Impact in
- Food Science top 5%
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
- Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
- Animal Science and Zoology top 10%
- Meat and Animal Product Quality
Papers in
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 3
-
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 2
- Proteins in Food Systems 2
- Co-authors
- D. Kilcast (2 shared papers)Peter A. Williams (3 shared papers)Ian Robb (3 shared papers)Martin J. Snowden (1 shared paper)Patrick B. Warren (1 shared paper)K. J. McCracken (1 shared paper)M.R. Bedford (1 shared paper)Caroline M. Preston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (3 papers)Food Quality and Preference (1 paper)British Poultry Science (1 paper)Langmuir (1 paper)Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stuart Clegg
10 papers receiving 263 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Food Science 154
- Animal Science and Zoology 47
- Nutrition and Dietetics 67
- Sensory Systems 14
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 27
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Clegg
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Clegg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Clegg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Clegg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Clegg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Clegg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Clegg. The network helps show where Stuart Clegg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Clegg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 142 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 7 | THE STRUCTURAL AND COMPOSITIONAL BASIS OF CREAMINESS IN FOOD EMULSION GELS | 2003 | 4 |
| 8 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 1 |
About Stuart Clegg
Stuart Clegg is a scholar working on Physiology, Food Science, Organic Chemistry, Animal Science and Zoology and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 10 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (2 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (2 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (2 papers), Proteins in Food Systems (2 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (2 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (1 paper) and Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (154 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (47 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (67 citations), Sensory Systems (14 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (27 citations). Stuart Clegg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include D. Kilcast, Peter A. Williams, Ian Robb, Martin J. Snowden, Patrick B. Warren, K. J. McCracken, M.R. Bedford, Caroline M. Preston, Tom Preston and Shahrul Mt‐Isa. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of The Nutrition Society, Food Quality and Preference, British Poultry Science, Langmuir and Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.