Steven R. Scadding

38 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Steven R. Scadding
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Developmental Biology 23
  • Biomaterials 102
  • Physiology 33
  • Aquatic Science 50
  • Molecular Biology 352
Replace Richard A. Liversage with:
Richard A. Liversage Canada
Swani Vethamany‐Globus Canada
Thomas G. Connelly United States
James Norman Dent United States
Charles S. Thornton United States
E. M. Deuchar United Kingdom
Thomas J. King United States
Srikrishna Putta United States
Harold Fox United Kingdom
Hefzibah Eyal‐Giladi Israel
Steven R. Scadding relative to Richard A. Liversage Canada Richard A. Liversage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Richard A. Liversage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven R. Scadding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven R. Scadding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven R. Scadding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven R. Scadding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven R. Scadding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven R. Scadding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven R. Scadding. The network helps show where Steven R. Scadding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Steven R. Scadding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven R. Scadding Line = papers co-authored together Steven R. Scadding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199478
2 197767
3 198152
4 198644
5
Comparison of the effects of vitamin A on limb development and regeneration in the axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum.
198642
6 199139
7 196928
8 198619
9 198317
10 200216
11 198213
12 199912
13 198310
14 198710
15 19889
16 19909
17 19928
18 19748
19 19887
20 19787

About Steven R. Scadding

Steven R. Scadding is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Aquatic Science and Ocean Engineering, having authored 43 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (13 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (12 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry (7 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (6 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (5 papers), Aquatic life and conservation (4 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (23 citations), Biomaterials (102 citations), Physiology (33 citations), Aquatic Science (50 citations) and Molecular Biology (352 citations). Steven R. Scadding has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Maden, Keith Johnson, Richard A. Liversage, Sonia V. del Rincón, Andrew Burns, Brenda L. Coomber and D. L. Barber. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Zoology, Journal of Experimental Zoology, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, Development and The Anatomical Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact