Steven Estes

25 papers receiving 351 citations

Peers

Steven Estes
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 17
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Physiology 98
Replace Daniel R. Bateman with:
Daniel R. Bateman United States
John R. Fedota United States
Jung Lee South Korea
H Schenk Netherlands
Suzanne Ftouni Australia
William F. Storm United States
Maria Grazia Vaccaro Italy
Jorge Ibáñez-Gijón Spain
Yanhong Yu China
Kathy Kar‐man Shum Hong Kong
Steven Estes relative to Daniel R. Bateman United States Daniel R. Bateman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Daniel R. Bateman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Estes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Estes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Estes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Estes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Estes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Estes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Estes. The network helps show where Steven Estes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven Estes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven Estes Line = papers co-authored together Steven Estes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199980
2 199966
3 199441
4 200634
5 201529
6 199729
7 199722
8
Digital Copilot: Cognitive Assistance for Pilots.
201611
9 20129
10 19938
11 20107
12 19936
13
Naturalistic Decision Making in the Air Traffic Control Tower: Combining Approaches to Support Changes in Procedures
20056
14 20184
15 20194
16 20094
17 20183
18 20052
19 20032
20 20221

About Steven Estes

Steven Estes is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (13 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (9 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (2 papers) and Cognitive Science and Mapping (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (24 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (17 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (57 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations) and Physiology (98 citations). Steven Estes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include David G. Gilbert, Charles J. Meliska, Jennifer D. Brooks, F. Joseph McClernon, Norka E. Rabinovich, Robert A. Jensen, Louisette C. Plath, John Helleberg, Kevin J. Burns and Jon F. DeFrance. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Personality and Individual Differences, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, The Journal of Southern History and IEEE Computer Applications in Power.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact