Steve Black

762 citations
44 papers · 530 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Steve Black

36 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Steve Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Library and Information Sciences 42
  • Immunology 146
  • Health 48
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 30
Replace Charlotte Ford with:
Charlotte Ford United States
Kathy Merlock Jackson Australia
R.J. Russell United Kingdom
Jonathon Alexis Coates United Kingdom
Kimberly Green United States
Bamini Jayabalasingham United States
Erin L. Miller United States
Anthony Bowen United States
C J Hackett United States
Carol A. Thornton United States
Steve Black relative to Charlotte Ford United States Charlotte Ford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Charlotte Ford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Black. The network helps show where Steve Black may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Black, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Black Line = papers co-authored together Steve Black links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011286
2 199741
3 200129
4 201619
5 199917
6 199315
7
Impact of full text on print journal use at a Liberal Arts College
200510
8 20189
9 20139
10 20179
11 20128
12 20177
13 20177
14 20166
15 20125
16 20165
17 20195
18 20185
19 19975
20 20174

About Steve Black

Steve Black is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 44 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (9 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (7 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Psychological and Educational Research Studies (3 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (42 citations), Immunology (146 citations), Health (48 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (30 citations). Steve Black has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ennio De Gregorio, Rino Rappuoli, Christian W. Mandl, James D. Allen, P. J. McDonald, Ian Hopkinson, Richard Jones, D. J. Hannant, M. Mulheron and Ross Krawczyk. Their work appears in journals such as The Reference Librarian, Library Resources and Technical Services, The Serials Librarian, Serials Review and Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact