Sterling N. Wright

741 citations
15 papers · 667 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Sterling N. Wright

15 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Sterling N. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 273
  • Pharmacology 77
  • Biochemistry 64
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 129
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 151
Replace Caijing Han with:
Caijing Han China
Katsuji Hoshi Japan
Makoto Muramatsu Japan
Hartmut O. Balzer Germany
Jeffrey F. Pregenzer United States
Joseph J. McPhillips United States
Anne E. Holley United Kingdom
Rían W. Manville United States
Maria Dulce Cotrim Portugal
Bo Kyung Lee South Korea
Sterling N. Wright relative to Caijing Han China Caijing Han's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.5×
Caijing Han · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sterling N. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sterling N. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sterling N. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sterling N. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sterling N. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sterling N. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sterling N. Wright. The network helps show where Sterling N. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Sterling N. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sterling N. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sterling N. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1998159
2 199884
3 199774
4 200069
5 199945
6 200145
7 199344
8 200240
9 199534
10 199629
11 199627
12 20048
13 20045
14 20032
15 20012

About Sterling N. Wright

Sterling N. Wright is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 15 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (12 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Plant-based Medicinal Research (2 papers) and Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (273 citations), Pharmacology (77 citations), Biochemistry (64 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (129 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (151 citations). Sterling N. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ging Kuo Wang, James P. Morgan, Yong‐Fu Xiao, Alexander Leaf, George D. Bittner, Malcolm S. Brodwick, Jay A. Blundon, Roland G. Kallen, G K Wang and Yong-Fu Xiao. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Molecular Pharmacology, Biophysical Journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact