Stephen Winn

621 citations
19 papers · 413 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Winn

18 papers receiving 370 citations

Peers

Stephen Winn
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Safety Research 119
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 76
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
  • Clinical Psychology 65
  • Education 93
Replace Cody Abbey with:
Cody Abbey United States
Sarah‐Eve Dill United States
Rima Shore
Almudena Martorell Spain
Anne Guèvremont Canada
Hamidin Awang Malaysia
Abbie Raikes United States
Barry Forer Canada
Jody S. Nicholson United States
Angela D. Bardick Canada
Stephen Winn relative to Cody Abbey United States Cody Abbey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Cody Abbey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Winn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Winn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Winn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Winn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Winn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Winn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Winn. The network helps show where Stephen Winn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Winn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Winn Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Winn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2009102
2 202066
3 201948
4 200747
5 202130
6 200526
7 200523
8 202217
9 201515
10 200712
11 200610
12 20194
13 20233
14 20213
15 20072
16
High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder: A challenge to secondary school educators and the students with the condition
20122
17 20211
18
Making the move: Information for families of children with a disability making the move from primary to secondary school
20101
19
Professional experience preparation: does distance make a difference?
20111

About Stephen Winn

Stephen Winn is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (4 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (119 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (76 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations), Clinical Psychology (65 citations) and Education (93 citations). Stephen Winn has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Bangladesh and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Ian Hay, Sayan Chakrabarty, Sue Saltmarsh, Catherine Ferguson, Margaret K. Merga, Jason A. Bennie, Gerald A. Maguire, Julie Youm, J. Christian Fox and Warren Wiechmann. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Sign language studies, Heliyon and Disability & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact