Stephen Wallis

10 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers

Stephen Wallis
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 192
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 74
  • Emergency Medicine 28
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 11
  • Health Information Management 11
Replace Richard Biram with:
Richard Biram United Kingdom
Mayukh Samanta Australia
Jenelle L. Pederson Canada
Arturo Vilches‐Moraga United Kingdom
Amy Deutschendorf United States
Ella Rokosh Canada
Helle Gybel Juul‐Larsen Denmark
Nazima Allaudeen United States
Cristina Roman Australia
Avantika A. Saraf United States
Stephen Wallis relative to Richard Biram United Kingdom Richard Biram's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Biram · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Wallis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Wallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Wallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Wallis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Wallis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Wallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Wallis. The network helps show where Stephen Wallis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Wallis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Wallis Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Wallis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2016119
2 2012111
3 202083
4 201742
5 201110
6 20189
7 20185
8 20143
9 20142
10 20151

About Stephen Wallis

Stephen Wallis is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Surgery, General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases and Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (6 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (2 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (1 paper), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (1 paper), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (1 paper), Disaster Response and Management (1 paper) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (192 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (74 citations), Emergency Medicine (28 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (11 citations) and Health Information Management (11 citations). Stephen Wallis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Richard Biram, Román Romero‐Ortuño, Victoria L. Keevil, Paul Cotter, Jasmine Wall, Nicholas R. Evans, Elizabeth A. Warburton, Ewen Cameron, Duncan R. Forsyth and Bernice Dahn. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, European Journal of Internal Medicine, Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh and Journal of Hospital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact