Stephen Powers

1.6k citations
45 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

    • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry 4
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 3
    • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis 11

Stephen Powers

45 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stephen Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 372
  • Molecular Biology 714
  • Plant Science 375
  • Cell Biology 129
  • Cancer Research 107
Replace Shmaryahu Blumberg with:
Shmaryahu Blumberg Israel
Jui Yoa Chang Australia
Gary M. Hathaway United States
Roger W. Roeske United States
Céline Tarnus France
Severino Ronchi Italy
Frits C. Stevens Canada
Michael G. Gore United Kingdom
Fernando Marchiori Italy
Albert Light United States
Stephen Powers relative to Shmaryahu Blumberg Israel Shmaryahu Blumberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Shmaryahu Blumberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Powers. The network helps show where Stephen Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Powers Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984144
2 2011138
3 1993101
4 198897
5 198774
6 201362
7 198960
8 198857
9 197954
10 201451
11 201351
12 198841
13 198939
14 201237
15 198726
16 201424
17 201324
18 199022
19 198920
20 198817

About Stephen Powers

Stephen Powers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Plant Science and Food Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (12 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (11 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (9 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (372 citations), Molecular Biology (714 citations), Plant Science (375 citations), Cell Biology (129 citations) and Cancer Research (107 citations). Stephen Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Laurence J. Miller, Angelo Visconti, Delia I. Pinon, Veronica M. T. Lattanzio, Harold A. Scheraga, Lucia Gambacorta, Gregory J. Gores, Michele Solfrizzo, Herbert Y. Gaisano and Elizabeth M. Hadac. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemistry, Society and Molecular Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact