Stephen P. Powers

1.6k citations
47 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen P. Powers

46 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Stephen P. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 413
  • Molecular Biology 749
  • Plant Science 401
  • Cell Biology 135
  • Cancer Research 109
Replace Frits C. Stevens with:
Frits C. Stevens United States
Shmaryahu Blumberg Israel
Céline Tarnus France
Grace Han United States
Albert Light United States
Caterina Fattorusso Italy
Susan P. Manly United States
Linda L. Maggiora United States
J.F. Cutfield New Zealand
Giuseppe La Regina Italy
Stephen P. Powers relative to Frits C. Stevens United States Frits C. Stevens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Frits C. Stevens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen P. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen P. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen P. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen P. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen P. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen P. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen P. Powers. The network helps show where Stephen P. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen P. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen P. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Stephen P. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984153
2 2011146
3 1993107
4 198898
5 198778
6 198968
7 201368
8 198859
9 197955
10 201453
11 201353
12 198846
13 198941
14 201237
15 198728
16 201427
17 201325
18 198925
19 199024
20 198822

About Stephen P. Powers

Stephen P. Powers is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology, Food Science, Plant Science and Biochemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (12 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (11 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (11 papers), Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers), Lung Cancer Research Studies (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (413 citations), Molecular Biology (749 citations), Plant Science (401 citations), Cell Biology (135 citations) and Cancer Research (109 citations). Stephen P. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Laurence J. Miller, Angelo Visconti, Delia I. Pinon, Veronica M. T. Lattanzio, Harold A. Scheraga, Lucia Gambacorta, Gregory James Gores, Herbert Y. Gaisano, Michele Solfrizzo and Elizabeth M. Hadac. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemistry, Society and Molecular Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact